Il 15/01/2014 13:09, Alex Bligh ha scritto: >> > Nope. There is shasum (because perl provides it) and md5 >> > (not md5sum). > shasum -a 256 should produce the same output as sha256sum > > From the manpage: > > Since shasum uses the same interface employed by the familiar sha1sum > program (and its somewhat outmoded anscestor md5sum), you can install > this script as a convenient drop-in replacement.
The exact hash we use is not a problem, we're not looking for crypto safety. Paolo