On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:55 AM, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 8 January 2014 18:39, M P <buser...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I will re-add the trace for both write and read and see if I can narrow the >> range down; it will be linux specific, tho, that's why I thought a >> 'catchall' block was more appropriate.
I would suggest you do the ones you care about properly, and RAZ/WI+qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, the rest. When it comes to the unimplemented, hard obvious failure from a totally unresponsive register is preferrable to subtle infidelities (like being able to write to RO register). Regards, Peter > > Well, we should be implementing what the hardware does, > generally. Misimplementing things as "read as written" > isn't really any better than misimplementing them as > RAZ/WI, it's just differently wrong. > > thanks > -- PMM >
