On 30 December 2013 14:58, Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net> wrote: > On 12/28/2013 01:49 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: >> + uint64_t vlo = float64_val(env->vfp.regs[i * 2]); >> + uint64_t vhi = float64_val(env->vfp.regs[(i * 2) + 1]); >> + cpu_fprintf(f, "q%02d.0=%016" PRIx64 ":%016" PRIx64 " ", >> + i, vlo, vhi); > > Why print them lo:hi instead of, what would seem to me, the more natural > hi:lo.
Whoops, didn't read this patch quite closely enough :-) > And what's that .0 qualifier doing on the end of an integer print field? May be poorly edited remnant from a previous labelling of the two halves as x.0 and x.1. Will remove. thanks -- PMM
