On 12/28/2013 08:47 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > Assuming the fields > it accesses aren't also being used for TCG memory globals, > presumably NO_RWG_SE if the field is only read, and > NO_RWG if it's written?
Correct. r~
On 12/28/2013 08:47 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > Assuming the fields > it accesses aren't also being used for TCG memory globals, > presumably NO_RWG_SE if the field is only read, and > NO_RWG if it's written?
Correct. r~