On 12/27/2013 12:48 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 11:51:04PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> On 12/26/2013 09:49 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 09:13:31PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>>> On 12/25/2013 08:52 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 12:36:12PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>>>>> On 12/25/2013 02:43 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 01:15:29AM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 12/24/2013 08:40 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 02:09:07PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 12/24/2013 03:24 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 02:01:13AM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/23/2013 01:46 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/22/2013 09:56 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 02:01:23AM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am having a problem with virtio-net + vhost on POWER7 machine
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - it does
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not survive reboot of the guest.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Steps to reproduce:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. boot the guest
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. configure eth0 and do ping - everything works
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. reboot the guest (i.e. type "reboot")
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4. when it is booted, eth0 can be configured but will not work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at all.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The test is:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ifconfig eth0 172.20.1.2 up
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ping 172.20.1.23
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If to run tcpdump on the host's "tap-id3" interface, it shows
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no trafic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coming from the guest. If to compare how it works before and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after reboot,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can see the guest doing an ARP request for 172.20.1.23 and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> receives the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> response and it does the same after reboot but the answer does
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not come.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you see the arp packet in guest but not in host?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> One thing to try is to boot debug kernel - where pr_debug is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enabled - then you might see some errors in the kernel log.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tried and added lot more debug printk myself, not clear at all
>>>>>>>>>>>>> what is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> happening there.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> One more hint - if I boot the guest and the guest does not bring
>>>>>>>>>>>>> eth0 up
>>>>>>>>>>>>> AND wait more than 200 seconds (and less than 210 seconds), then
>>>>>>>>>>>>> eth0 will
>>>>>>>>>>>>> not work at all. I.e. this script produces not-working-eth0:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ifconfig eth0 172.20.1.2 down
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sleep 210
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ifconfig eth0 172.20.1.2 up
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ping 172.20.1.23
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> s/210/200/ - and it starts working. No reboot is required to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> reproduce.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> No "vhost" == always works. The only difference I can see here is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> vhost's
>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread which may get suspended if not used for a while after the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> start and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> does not wake up but this is almost a blind guess.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yet another clue - this host kernel patch seems to help with the
>>>>>>>>>>>> guest
>>>>>>>>>>>> reboot but does not help with the initial 210 seconds delay:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
>>>>>>>>>>>> index 69068e0..5e67650 100644
>>>>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
>>>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -162,10 +162,10 @@ void vhost_work_queue(struct vhost_dev *dev,
>>>>>>>>>>>> struct
>>>>>>>>>>>> vhost_work *work)
>>>>>>>>>>>> list_add_tail(&work->node, &dev->work_list);
>>>>>>>>>>>> work->queue_seq++;
>>>>>>>>>>>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->work_lock, flags);
>>>>>>>>>>>> - wake_up_process(dev->worker);
>>>>>>>>>>>> } else {
>>>>>>>>>>>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->work_lock, flags);
>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>> + wake_up_process(dev->worker);
>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_work_queue);
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Interesting. Some kind of race? A missing memory barrier somewhere?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I do not see how. I boot the guest and just wait 210 seconds, nothing
>>>>>>>>>> happens to cause races.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Since it's all around startup,
>>>>>>>>>>> you can try kicking the host eventfd in
>>>>>>>>>>> vhost_net_start.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> How exactly? This did not help. Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/hw/net/vhost_net.c b/hw/net/vhost_net.c
>>>>>>>>>> index 006576d..407ecf2 100644
>>>>>>>>>> --- a/hw/net/vhost_net.c
>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/hw/net/vhost_net.c
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -229,6 +229,17 @@ int vhost_net_start(VirtIODevice *dev,
>>>>>>>>>> NetClientState
>>>>>>>>>> *ncs,
>>>>>>>>>> if (r < 0) {
>>>>>>>>>> goto err;
>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + VHostNetState *vn = tap_get_vhost_net(ncs[i].peer);
>>>>>>>>>> + struct vhost_vring_file file = {
>>>>>>>>>> + .index = i
>>>>>>>>>> + };
>>>>>>>>>> + file.fd =
>>>>>>>>>> event_notifier_get_fd(virtio_queue_get_host_notifier(dev->vq));
>>>>>>>>>> + r = ioctl(vn->dev.control, VHOST_SET_VRING_KICK, &file);
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No, this sets the notifier, it does not kick.
>>>>>>>>> To kick you write 1 there:
>>>>>>>>> uint6_t v = 1;
>>>>>>>>> write(fd, &v, sizeof v);
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please, be precise. How/where do I get that @fd? Is what I do correct?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What
>>>>>>>> is uint6_t - uint8_t or uint16_t (neither works)?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry, should have been uint64_t.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh, that I missed :-) Anyway, this does not make any difference. Is there
>>>>>> any cheap&dirty way to make vhost-net kernel thread always awake? Sending
>>>>>> it signals from the user space does not work...
>>>>>
>>>>> You can run a timer in qemu and signal the eventfd from there
>>>>> periodically.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just to restate, tcpdump in guest shows that guest sends arp packet,
>>>>> but tcpdump in host on tun device does not show any packets?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ok. Figured it out about disabling interfaces in Fedora19. I was wrong,
>>>> something is happening on the host's TAP - the guest sends ARP request, the
>>>> response is visible on the TAP interface but not in the guest.
>>>
>>> Okay. So problem is on host to guest path then.
>>> Things to try:
>>>
>>> 1. trace handle_rx [vhost_net]
>>> 2. trace tun_put_user [tun]
>>> 3. I suspect some host bug in one of the features.
>>> Let's try to disable some flags with device property:
>>> you can get the list by doing:
>>> ./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -device virtio-net-pci,?|grep on/off
>>> Things I would try turning off is guest offloads (ones that start with
>>> guest_)
>>> event_idx,any_layout,mq.
>>> Turn them all off, if it helps try to find the one that helped.
>>
>>
>> Heh. It still would be awesome to read basics about this vhost thing as I
>> am debugging blindly :)
>>
>> Regarding your suggestions.
>>
>> 1. I put "printk" in handle_rx and tun_put_user.
>
> Fine, though it's easier with ftrace http://lwn.net/Articles/370423/
> look for function filtering.
>
>> handle_rx stopped being called after 2:40 from the guest start,
>> tun_put_user stopped after 0:20 from the guest start. Accuracy is 5 seconds.
>> If I bring the guest's eth0 up while handle_rx is still printing, it works,
>> i.e. tun_put_user is called a lot. Once handle_rx stopped, nothing can
>> bring eth0 back to live.
>
> OK so what should happen is that handle rx is called
> when you bring eth0 up.
> Do you see this?
> The way it is supposed to work is this:
>
> vhost_net_enable_vq calls vhost_poll_start then
This and what follows it is called when QEMU is just booting (in response
to PCI enable? somewhere in the middle of PCI discovery process) and then
VHOST_NET_SET_BACKEND is not called ever again.
> this calls mask = file->f_op->poll(file, &poll->table)
> on the tun file.
> this calls tun_chr_poll.
> at this point there are packets queued on tun already
> so that returns POLLIN | POLLRDNORM;
> this calls vhost_poll_wakeup and that checks mask against
> the key.
> key is POLLIN so vhost_poll_queue is called.
> this in turn calls vhost_work_queue
> work list is either empty then we wake up worker
> or it's not empty then worker is running out job anyway.
> this will then invoke handle_rx_net.
>
>
>> 2. This is exactly how I run QEMU now. I basically set "off" for every
>> on/off parameters. This did not change anything.
>>
>> ./qemu-system-ppc64 \
>> -enable-kvm \
>> -m 2048 \
>> -L qemu-ppc64-bios/ \
>> -machine pseries \
>> -trace events=qemu_trace_events \
>> -kernel vml312 \
>> -append root=/dev/sda3 virtimg/fc19_16GB_vhostdbg.qcow2 \
>> -nographic \
>> -vga none \
>> -nodefaults \
>> -chardev stdio,id=id0,signal=off,mux=on \
>> -device spapr-vty,id=id1,chardev=id0,reg=0x71000100 \
>> -mon id=id2,chardev=id0,mode=readline \
>> -netdev
>> tap,id=id3,ifname=tap-id3,script=ifup.sh,downscript=ifdown.sh,vhost=on \
>> -device
>> virtio-net-pci,id=id4,netdev=id3,mac=C0:41:49:4b:00:00,tx=timer,ioeventfd=off,\
>> indirect_desc=off,event_idx=off,any_layout=off,csum=off,guest_csum=off,\
>> gso=off,guest_tso4=off,guest_tso6=off,guest_ecn=off,guest_ufo=off,\
>> host_tso4=off,host_tso6=off,host_ecn=off,host_ufo=off,mrg_rxbuf=off,\
>> status=off,ctrl_vq=off,ctrl_rx=off,ctrl_vlan=off,ctrl_rx_extra=off,\
>> ctrl_mac_addr=off,ctrl_guest_offloads=off,mq=off,multifunction=off,\
>> command_serr_enable=off \
>> -netdev user,id=id5,hostfwd=tcp::5000-:22 \
>> -device spapr-vlan,id=id6,netdev=id5,mac=C0:41:49:4b:00:01
>>
>
> Yes this looks like some kind of race.
--
Alexey
