On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 04:22:47PM +1000, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 3:51 PM, <edgar.igles...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.igles...@xilinx.com>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.igles...@xilinx.com>
> > ---
> > target-microblaze/cpu.c | 6 ++++++
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/target-microblaze/cpu.c b/target-microblaze/cpu.c
> > index 0ef9aa4..6d39d3d 100644
> > --- a/target-microblaze/cpu.c
> > +++ b/target-microblaze/cpu.c
> > @@ -93,6 +93,9 @@ static void mb_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error
> > **errp)
> > CPUState *cs = CPU(dev);
> > MicroBlazeCPUClass *mcc = MICROBLAZE_CPU_GET_CLASS(dev);
> >
> > +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> > + cpu_address_space_init(cs, cs->as);
> > +#endif
> > cpu_reset(cs);
> > qemu_init_vcpu(cs);
> >
> > @@ -123,6 +126,9 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_mb_cpu = {
> > };
> >
> > static Property mb_properties[] = {
> > +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> > + DEFINE_PROP_ADDRESS_SPACE("address-space", CPUState, as),
> > +#endif
>
> Why not add it as a property on the base CPU level?
>
Hi,
Yes, I can have a look at doing that. It will probably involve having some
kind of implementation of the AS prop for user emulation as qom/cpu.o is
supposed to be common for both. Andreas, do you have any preferences on how
this should be done?
Thanks,
Edgar
