On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Izik Eidus wrote: > On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:57:48 -0600 > Anthony Liguori <anth...@codemonkey.ws> wrote: > [..snip..]
> > Spice desgien is highly diffrence than VNC > The first thing about spice is that it isnt just a framebuffer drawing > and not a bitmaps protocol. > > Spice protocl support multiple graphics commands, multiple surfaces > drawings, Spice is desgined to render as less as it can on the server > and instead to render on the client side much of the work, > To achive this spice use all kind of techniques such as depth viewing > tree. > > We already have patchs that support offscreen surfaces -> the > architacture for high end 3d, this make things even more complicated. > > Spice is a library, it is library for remote display, it handle by > itself all the connection between the spice client to the host that run > the guest, it include: > sound, display, keyboard, usb, network tunneling (for printers) and so > on... > > The patchs that we wanted to push into qemu were what is called VDI > interfaces, it allow to qemu work with what ever interface it want, > what so bad about that? > > I think we should allow freedom of choice to the users to decide what > protcol they want to use, Spice and VNC are all diffrent and were born > to meet diffrent goals. > > I would happy to answer more questions if anyone have Any particular reason for implementing audio as a driver instead of a capture? -- mailto:av1...@comtv.ru
