Either version is fine with me :)
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > I thought that for lines that are just a logical or of constants > > it would be ok to go over 80 columns, since the alternatives > > > > (shortening the names of constants or breaking the line) > > > > are a little less readable. > > I don't find the broken lines unreadable, especially if > you align the stuff nicely like you did ... > > > > ... and broke the two lines > > that were still longer than 80 columns, > > ... here. > > But if you prefer it this way with the shorter constants, no problem, > I'll happily take it as-is. > > cheers, > Gerd > > >
