On 09.12.2013, at 21:42, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: > Il 09/12/2013 20:25, Alexander Graf ha scritto: >> >> >>> Am 22.11.2013 um 10:27 schrieb Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>: >>> >>> spapr-nvram's drive property is currently connected to a non-existent >>> "-machine nvram=<drivename>" option. Instead, tie it to -pflash like >>> other non-volatile RAM devices. This provides the following possibilities >>> for adding a backend for the sPAPR non-volatile RAM: >>> >>> * -pflash filename >>> >>> * -drive if=pflash,file=filename,format=raw,... >>> >>> * -drive if=none,file=filename,format=raw,id=foo,... -global >>> spapr-nvram.drive=foo >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> >> >> Makes sense, but why for 1.7? > > At this point it is not for 1.7 of course. :)
Heh alrighty then :). Thanks, applied to ppc-next. Alex
