Il 27/11/2013 15:37, Igor Mammedov ha scritto: > It looks like "realize" for -object / object-add implemented via > an interface.
It does---but without unrealize and with the additional get_base_path. > Maybe it should be renamed from QOMCommandLineIface to QOMRealizeIface > and s/complete/realize/ so anyone who knows about Device.realize would > get meaning without digging in complete() implementations. There is an important difference; realize is an internal method in Device, the external interface is the property. So perhaps it's the other way round; if Device implements QOMCommandLineIface you could start creating devices with -object. > Alternative would be to behave just like Rng/Tpm do, i.e. use -object > to do late initialization in a backend user (DimmDevice.realize). > Draw back of it would be user won't get error during the first command > "object-add" and only will get error when creating DimmDevice calling > "device_add". That's also a possibility. But again, maybe it's the other way round and Rng/Tpm could enjoy better error handling if we add the interface. Paolo
