On 11/12/2013 11:45 PM, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 12.11.2013 13:39, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy: >> On 12.11.2013 20:58, Igor Mammedov wrote: >>> PS: >>> extending QemuOpts to parsing +/-opts format, seems like good workaround >>> above problem. But I was under impression that general movement was to >>> convert >>> custom formats to canonical format "prop=value". >> >> Heh. I do not understand movements in the qemu project most of the time >> :) I thought I could have added "compat" to PowerPC CPU as others did >> but I was so wrong :) > > Hey, I instructed you how to do exactly that, with a const char * > argument, but you chose rather to experiment more with QemuOpts. ;) > Don't blame us! :-)
So instead of reusing QemuOpts infrastructure, you suggest to re-implement the parser one more time, don't you? I still cannot believe it. -- Alexey
