Il 04/11/2013 18:41, Andreas Färber ha scritto: >> > I agree that we need some way to programmatically list all machine options. > I wonder if it would make sense to mirror all -machine options as > dynamic properties on /machine? :) > Their addition could still be driven by the declarative format. > We could then easily not only list but also inspect the values of those > options at runtime.
Yes, I agree. Perhaps not all of them however; probably not accel= and probably not kvm_type too. In fact, what I don't like about this patch is that it doesn't really feel "right" to put it in -machine. On the other hand we definitely do not want to split it further to -accel. Oh well, it seems like designing the right command-line interface is the hardest part of doing QEMU. Paolo > It wouldn't immediately solve Jan's documentation problem, but that's > more general than just -machine, isn't it? > > CC'ing Anthony and Paolo.
