On 02.11.2013 14:04, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 14.10.2013 23:52, Wenchao Xia wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Wenchao Xia <xiaw...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>  block/qcow2-snapshot.c |    7 +++++++
>>  1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/qcow2-snapshot.c b/block/qcow2-snapshot.c
>> index 4bd494b..c933b7f 100644
>> --- a/block/qcow2-snapshot.c
>> +++ b/block/qcow2-snapshot.c
>> @@ -304,6 +304,13 @@ static int qcow2_write_snapshots(BlockDriverState *bs, 
>> Error **errp)
>>                     PRIi64 " with size %" PRIu64 ":%d (%s)",
>>                     offsetof(QCowHeader, nb_snapshots), sizeof(header_data),
>>                     ret, strerror(-ret));
>> +        /*
>> +         * If the snapshot data part have been updated on disk, Then the
> s/have/has/; s/Then/then/
>
>> +         * clusters at snapshot_offset may be used in next snapshot 
>> operation.
>> +         * If we free those clusters in fail path, they may be allocated and
>> +         * made dirty causing damage, so skip cluster free for safe.
> s/for/to be/
>
>> +         */
>> +        snapshots_offset = 0;
>>          goto fail;
>>      }
> Other then that: Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mre...@redhat.com>

*than, of course; if I am already correcting other people's orthography,
I have to do the same for mine. ;-)

Max

Reply via email to