Hi,

Am 14.10.2013 18:29, schrieb Michael Walle:
> This allows us to completely remove CPULM32State from DisasContext.
> Instead, copy the fields we need to DisasContext.
> 
> Cc: Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <mich...@walle.cc>

Sorry for not getting to review this earlier.

The subject makes it sound to me as if a "features" field were being
moved from CPULM32State to LM32CPU, which would be great, as done or
proposed elsewhere.
However, instead it is adding a pointer field to LM32CPU to the
definition the class was originally created from IIUC. I would rather
access those fields through LM32CPUClass then (an existing pointer in
the object instance) - but since xtensa is still doing the same and this
not being functionally wrong, no objection to the pull, just a note that
we should revisit it.

Regards,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg

Reply via email to