On 8 Oct 2013, at 20:21, Hans de Goede wrote: > Wasn't it 1 ms until the offending commit (note 250 us does > sound better to me).
I believe you've made it 1 nanosecond not 1 millisecond; can that be right? -- Alex Bligh
On 8 Oct 2013, at 20:21, Hans de Goede wrote: > Wasn't it 1 ms until the offending commit (note 250 us does > sound better to me).
I believe you've made it 1 nanosecond not 1 millisecond; can that be right? -- Alex Bligh