On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 12:10:52AM +0900, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 30 September 2013 23:40, Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote: > > diff --git a/include/qapi/error.h b/include/qapi/error.h > > index 7d4c696..b85e996 100644 > > --- a/include/qapi/error.h > > +++ b/include/qapi/error.h > > @@ -13,14 +13,15 @@ > > #define ERROR_H > > > > #include "qemu/compiler.h" > > +#include "qemu/typedefs.h" > > #include "qapi-types.h" > > #include <stdbool.h> > > > > /** > > - * A class representing internal errors within QEMU. An error has a > > ErrorClass > > + * Error: > > + * An object representing internal errors within QEMU. An error has a > > ErrorClass > > * code and a human message. > > */ > > -typedef struct Error Error; > > Does the process-doc-comments tool really cope with documentation comments > that are completely separate from the typedef like this? > > thanks > -- PMM
Do we care? Downstreams don't seem to package it, most people probably use editor tags anyway ... If yes we can put this all in #if 0.
