Am 27.09.2013 11:11, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi: > On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 07:20:21AM +0200, Stefan Weil wrote: >> Am 11.09.2013 16:42, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi: >>> The 'gthread' coroutine backend was written before the freelist (aka >>> pool) existed in qemu-coroutine.c. >>> >>> This means that every thread is expected to exit when its coroutine >>> terminates. It is not possible to reuse threads from a pool. >>> >>> This patch automatically disables the pool when 'gthread' is used. This >>> allows the 'gthread' backend to work again (for example, >>> tests/test-coroutine completes successfully instead of hanging). >>> >>> I considered implementing thread reuse but I don't want quirks like CPU >>> affinity differences due to coroutine threads being recycled. The >>> 'gthread' backend is a reference backend and it's therefore okay to skip >>> the pool optimization. >>> >>> Note this patch also makes it easy to toggle the pool for benchmarking >>> purposes: >>> >>> ./configure --with-coroutine-backend=ucontext \ >>> --disable-coroutine-pool >>> >>> Reported-by: Gabriel Kerneis <gabr...@kerneis.info> >>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com> >>> --- >>> configure | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> qemu-coroutine.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++--------------- >>> 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) >>> >> This patch is important for QEMU 1.5 as well, but needs some >> modifications there. >> A recent bug report for MinGW shows that the win32 coroutine needs it, too. > coroutine-win32.c is designed to support reuse: > > static void CALLBACK coroutine_trampoline(void *co_) > { > Coroutine *co = co_; > > while (true) { > co->entry(co->entry_arg); > qemu_coroutine_switch(co, co->caller, COROUTINE_TERMINATE); > } > } > > We return from qemu_coroutine_switch() when the fiber is reused and > simply run another iteration of the while loop. > > Why do you say win32 coroutines should disable the pool? > > Stefan
QEMU MinGW binaries with coroutine pool simply crash, and disabling the pool helps for the moment until we have a better fix. That's a regression which was introduced with a patch which added the pool for win32. See this discussion thread for more details: http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2013-09/msg04195.html Regards, Stefan