On 09/03/2013 10:32 PM, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <yamah...@private.email.ne.jp> --- migration-rdma.c | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)diff --git a/migration-rdma.c b/migration-rdma.c index e71c10a..db5a908 100644 --- a/migration-rdma.c +++ b/migration-rdma.c @@ -511,19 +511,21 @@ static int qemu_rdma_exchange_send(RDMAContext *rdma, RDMAControlHeader *head, int *resp_idx, int (*callback)(RDMAContext *rdma)); -static inline uint64_t ram_chunk_index(uint8_t *start, uint8_t *host) +static inline uint64_t ram_chunk_index(const uint8_t *start, + const uint8_t *host) { return ((uintptr_t) host - (uintptr_t) start) >> RDMA_REG_CHUNK_SHIFT; } -static inline uint8_t *ram_chunk_start(RDMALocalBlock *rdma_ram_block, +static inline uint8_t *ram_chunk_start(const RDMALocalBlock *rdma_ram_block, uint64_t i) { return (uint8_t *) (((uintptr_t) rdma_ram_block->local_host_addr) + (i << RDMA_REG_CHUNK_SHIFT)); } -static inline uint8_t *ram_chunk_end(RDMALocalBlock *rdma_ram_block, uint64_t i) +static inline uint8_t *ram_chunk_end(const RDMALocalBlock *rdma_ram_block, + uint64_t i) { uint8_t *result = ram_chunk_start(rdma_ram_block, i) + (1UL << RDMA_REG_CHUNK_SHIFT);
Isaku, you are sending lots of "little" patches which may or may not be properly rebased upon previous patches. Could you please group your current patch series into a single series with a descriptive cover letter along with the previous patches? If you need create a new patch specifically for RDMA before a previous patch as been applied to my tree, then please include the old one into the new patch series with a description and a "resend" in the title. Then I can review them at once apply them all to my tree so the maintaner has an easier time. Thanks, - Michael
