On 17 September 2013 19:46, Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net> wrote: > On 09/17/2013 10:46 AM, Michael Walle wrote: >> Am Montag, 9. September 2013, 18:47:21 schrieb Peter Maydell: >>> For lm32 you might consider raising EXCP_BREAKPOINT; >>> then if you have a gdb connected to the debug stub >>> the developer will get dropped into the debugger for >>> the offending insn and can look at it. >> >> Are you sure, this will drop to the debugger? I guess the target cpu jumps to >> the exception vector. > > He meant EXCP_DEBUG, I think.
I meant "treat it as if it were an explicit 'breakpoint' instruction". -- PMM
