On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 04:49:48PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > I'm not sure of the benefit of an hw/ipack directory if (a) there is > only one class providing the bus and (b) all the classes using the > bus (well, there is just one of them) are in the same directory. > > If any of the two conditions were not true anymore, I'd ask to > contextually create hw/ipack. But for now, keeping both ipack files > in hw/char is the most "economic" thing to do.
I decided to emulate both boards separately because it was not much more work and it seemed like a better idea to me, but it was the tpci200/ipoctal combination that I was interested in. So it sounds reasonable to me to keep both files together. Berto
