On 06.09.2013 17:39, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
If the sectors are unallocated and we are past the end of the
backing file, they will read as zero.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com>
---
block.c | 12 ++++++++++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block.c b/block.c
index aa9ec83..82bbd6c 100644
--- a/block.c
+++ b/block.c
@@ -3102,8 +3102,16 @@ static int64_t coroutine_fn
bdrv_co_get_block_status(BlockDriverState *bs,
return ret;
}
- if (!(ret & BDRV_BLOCK_DATA) && bdrv_has_zero_init(bs)) {
- ret |= BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO;
+ if (!(ret & BDRV_BLOCK_DATA)) {
+ if (bdrv_has_zero_init(bs)) {
this should be bdi->discard_zeroes. bdrv_has_zero_init() does only give a valid
result
right after bdrv_create(). i currently working on extending bdi. I can send a
patch for this
if you agree.
+ ret |= BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO;
+ } else {
+ BlockDriverState *bs2 = bs->backing_hd;
this segfaults if there is no backing_hd. found while testing get_block_status
with iscsi.
paolo, is this the correct fix?
@@ -3110,7 +3157,7 @@ static int64_t coroutine_fn
bdrv_co_get_block_status(BlockDriverState *bs,
if (!(ret & BDRV_BLOCK_DATA)) {
if (bdrv_has_zero_init(bs)) {
ret |= BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO;
- } else {
+ } else if (bs->backing_hd) {
BlockDriverState *bs2 = bs->backing_hd;
int64_t length2 = bdrv_getlength(bs2);
if (length2 >= 0 && sector_num >= (length2 >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS)) {
+ int64_t length2 = bdrv_getlength(bs2);
+ if (length2 >= 0 && sector_num >= (length2 >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS)) {
+ ret |= BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO;
+ }
+ }
}
return ret;
}