On 10.09.2013 10:45, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 10 September 2013 09:27, Claudio Fontana <claudio.font...@huawei.com> > wrote: >> On another side, I end up having to manually revert some parts >> of these which you put as prerequisites, during bisection when >> landing after them, which is a huge time drain when tracking >> regressions introduced in the later part of the series. > > I don't understand this; can you explain? If these early > refactoring patches have bugs then we should just identify > them and fix them. If they don't have bugs why would you > need to manually revert parts of them? >
To revert the next patches which do introduce bugs. I could not see bugs in the refactoring patches, but there is stuff to fix regardless of bugs.
