On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 05:29:06PM +0000, Bret Ketchum wrote: > > Great thanks. Any idea why the HD does not show?
There's no HD in your command line. > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael S. Tsirkin [mailto:m...@redhat.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 12:30 PM > To: Bret Ketchum > Cc: Qemu-devel@nongnu.org; kra...@redhat.com > Subject: Re: Q35 FreeBSD install status > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 04:16:35PM +0000, Bret Ketchum wrote: > > > > > > I’m looking for some guidance with regards to constructing a VM > > using a later version of FreeBSD. In reference to a qemu-devel posting: > > > > http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-08/msg03329.html > > > > I reran with both 1.6.0.rc3 and 1.6.50 the q35 FreeBSD tests with > > 9.0, 9.1 and 10-CURRENT using the following command line: > > > > qemu-kvm \ > > > > -hda /home/ehv/images/126802.img -enable-kvm -m 1G -monitor stdio -M q35 > > \ > > -vnc 127.0.0.1:1 -vga cirrus -monitor stdio \ > > -cdrom /home/ehv/images/FreeBSD-9.0-RELEASE-amd64-dvd1.iso -boot > > order=d > > > > Note the command line parameter changes necessary for the current > > versions of qemu. I'm running this on a Fedora 17/3.4.4 host and I've > > tried specifying SeaBios 1.7.3 with -bios and -acpitable command line > > options. Note also that both the ide and ahci tests (pc-i440fx-1.6) worked > > as advertised on this host. > > My trouble is that the bios does not see either the HDD image nor the cdrom. > > > > My questions are am I correct to expect the aforementioned q35 > > test (specifically the command line) to work? Am I missing something > > obvious? Is there something to look? > > > > Any insight will be appreciated. Thanks. > > > > > > > > Bret > > > > > > -cdrom doesn't work with ahci. > there's a new flag that replaces it, I keep forgetting what it is. > Will look it up tomorrow if no one beats me to it. > > -- > MST
