On 08/29/2013 12:29 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 28/08/2013 16:10, Alex Williamson ha scritto: >> On Wed, 2013-08-28 at 13:09 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> Il 28/08/2013 11:46, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto: >>>> On 08/22/2013 09:29 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >>>>> I made a couple of small patches while debugging VFIO on SPAPR >>>>> which uses IOMMU MemoryRegion 2^64 bytes long. >>>>> >>>>> Changes: >>>>> v3: >>>>> * "int128: add int128_exts64()" updated >>>>> >>>>> v2: >>>>> * added int128_exts64() function as a separate patch and used in >>>>> "vfio: Fix 128 bit handling" >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Alexey Kardashevskiy (3): >>>>> int128: add int128_exts64() >>>>> vfio: Fix debug output for int128 values >>>>> vfio: Fix 128 bit handling >>>>> >>>>> hw/misc/vfio.c | 19 +++++++++++++------ >>>>> include/qemu/int128.h | 5 +++++ >>>>> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> Ping? I fixed everything I was told to, is there anything left? Or we need >>>> to decide through which tree this should go? :) Thanks! >>> >>> I think it should go through Alex's tree, but he may be busy due to the >>> impending opening of the Linux merge window. >> >> I can take it if you could ACK the first patch. Thanks, > > Sure, consider it acked. :)
Soooo, Alex, can I consider them (first two I guess) taken by you to your tree? I cannot find them in any tree... -- Alexey
