On 09/09/2013 09:36 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
On Monday, September 09, 2013 12:38:12 PM Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 06/09/2013 20:41, Eduardo Otubo ha scritto:
Hello,

     Any chance to get this patch applied?

Thanks!

Paul, perhaps you can add yourself to MAINTAINERS and send a pull request?

Paolo

Out of respect for the work that Eduardo has done, and is continuing to do,
with the QEMU seccomp filtering, I think Eduardo should be the one to take on
this role.  If Eduardo declines I'll do ahead and submit a patch adding myself
to the MAINTAINERS file.

If this is ok for everyone, I would be really glad to take this role to myself. Paul, thanks for this vote of confidence. Paolo, should I send a patch for MAINTAINERS right away?

Regards,


On 09/04/2013 11:11 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
On Wednesday, September 04, 2013 09:25:08 AM Eduardo Otubo wrote:
This was causing Qemu process to hang when using -sandbox on.

Related RHBZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004175

Signed-off-by: Eduardo Otubo <ot...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Works for me.

Tested-by: Paul Moore <pmo...@redhat.com>

---

   qemu-seccomp.c |    1 +
   1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/qemu-seccomp.c b/qemu-seccomp.c
index 37d38f8..69cee44 100644
--- a/qemu-seccomp.c
+++ b/qemu-seccomp.c
@@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ static const struct QemuSeccompSyscall
seccomp_whitelist[]
= { { SCMP_SYS(getuid), 245 },

       { SCMP_SYS(geteuid), 245 },
       { SCMP_SYS(timer_create), 245 },

+    { SCMP_SYS(times), 245 },

       { SCMP_SYS(exit), 245 },
       { SCMP_SYS(clock_gettime), 245 },
       { SCMP_SYS(time), 245 },


--
Eduardo Otubo
IBM Linux Technology Center


Reply via email to