On 08/30/2013 02:23 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > As you said earlier the solution would have been to replace > helper_ret_ldl_mmu() by helper_ret_ldsl_mmu(), but it should have been > done in the same patch to not break things. I just wanted to make > sure we don't have the problem in an another target
Ah, but that's where we're in luck: helper_ret_ldl_mmu is brand new. It's all of a week old, introduced with the first set of these patches. There are no legacy users. r~
