Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:28:44PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: > >>> Is this on an x86_64 box or i386? I can boot the same kernel with >>> upstream qemu on another box with an x86_64 kernel and qemu. >>> >> I only test things on x86_64. so you're saying it breaks on an i586 >> host? >> > > Yes, both guest and host are 32 bit. >
Ok I just tried to reproduce this using my netbook (32 bits only) and your kernel: a...@linux-dpw4:~/git/qemu> uname -a Linux linux-dpw4 2.6.27.37-0.1-pae #1 SMP 2009-10-15 14:56:58 +0200 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux a...@linux-dpw4:~/git/qemu> ./i386-softmmu/qemu -enable-kvm -kernel /tmp/bzImage -append "console=ttyS0" -nographic -L pc-bios [ 0.000000] Linux version 2.6.32-rc7 (h...@brick) (gcc version 4.3.4 (Debian 4.3.4-5) ) #448 SMP Wed Nov 18 18:01:25 CET 2009 [ 0.000000] KERNEL supported cpus: [ 0.000000] Intel GenuineIntel [ 0.000000] AMD AuthenticAMD [ 0.000000] NSC Geode by NSC [ 0.000000] Cyrix CyrixInstead [ 0.000000] Centaur CentaurHauls [ 0.000000] Transmeta GenuineTMx86 [ 0.000000] Transmeta TransmetaCPU [ 0.000000] UMC UMC UMC UMC [ 0.000000] BIOS-provided physical RAM map: [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: 0000000000000000 - 000000000009f400 (usable) [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: 000000000009f400 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved) [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: 00000000000f0000 - 0000000000100000 (reserved) [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: 0000000000100000 - 0000000007ffd000 (usable) [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: 0000000007ffd000 - 0000000008000000 (reserved) [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: 00000000fffc0000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved) [ 0.000000] DMI 2.4 present. ... I don't see any breakage here. Alex
