On 20.08.2013, at 11:49, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Please fix your patch generation ;) > > Use SLB_ESID_V instead of (1 << 27) in the code > > Reviewed-by: Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> > Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Thanks, applied to ppc-next. Alex > --- > target-ppc/mmu_helper.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/target-ppc/mmu_helper.c b/target-ppc/mmu_helper.c > index 5dd4e05..9c9132e 100644 > --- a/target-ppc/mmu_helper.c > +++ b/target-ppc/mmu_helper.c > @@ -2061,7 +2061,7 @@ void helper_store_sr(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong > srnum, target_ulong value) > /* ESID = srnum */ > rb |= ((uint32_t)srnum & 0xf) << 28; > /* Set the valid bit */ > - rb |= 1 << 27; > + rb |= SLB_ESID_V; > /* Index = ESID */ > rb |= (uint32_t)srnum; > > -- > 1.8.1.2 >
