On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 11:22 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > Uhm... I thought Alex and I were the one who proposed the simple things. > You _will_ need to do the complicated stuff sooner or later, but it's > probably early enough now to ignore it. > > And I'm not saying this out of love for big cathedrals, but out of > lessons we learned the hard way for x86 (where we haven't gotten > everything right yet, either).
I suppose if RH is going to deploy 3.10 and we aren't going to backport the multitce patches then there *might* be a case for supporting that combo specifically... but it's going to be that bad every time we add a new feature with a kernel counter part or start adding the gazillion little bits of PAPR that we are still missing ? Ben.
