On 08/18/13 16:25, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 16/08/2013 16:59, Anthony Liguori ha scritto: >> Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com> writes: >> >>> Paolo asked me to write such a driver based on his textual specification >>> alone. The first patch captures his email in full, the rest re-quotes >>> parts that are being implemented. >>> >>> The tree compiles at each patch. The series passes "make check-block". >>> >>> "block/raw.c" is not removed because I wanted to keep it out of my >>> series and out of my brain. >>> >>> Disclaimer: I couldn't care less if the raw block driver was public >>> domain or AGPLv3+, as long as it qualifies as free software. I'm only >>> trying to do what Paolo asked of me. >> >> Generally speaking, rewriting parts of QEMU to be !GPL is something I >> would strongly, strongly oppose. >> >> I believe that Paolo had a good reason for this though. > > The reason is that Christoph said his original version of block/raw.c > was meant to be GPLv2-only. I don't care if the file is BSD or LGPLv2+, > but most of the block layer is BSD, which is why I went for BSD.
So, is it OK if, after fixing the small problem in 7/7, I post v2 again under the BSDL? Thanks, Laszlo
