Already in 1.6: commit a7d6b9f084765a834110bb9a2a0329b1a96de792 Author: Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> Date: Mon Aug 5 22:59:46 2013 +0200
target-ppc: Fix POWER7+ model Regards, Anthony Liguori On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de> wrote: > > On 05.08.2013, at 22:59, Andreas Färber wrote: > >> Commit 03a15a5436ed7723f406f15cc3798aa9991e75b5 claimed to add a POWER7+ >> model but instead added a "POWER7P" model, with an unhelpful "POWER7P" >> description on top. Fix this to "POWER7+" as we already have "POWER3+", >> "POWER4+" and "POWER5+" and there being no reason to deviate with the >> user-visible command line -cpu POWER7P from the marketing name POWER7+. >> >> Further, don't needlessly deviate from the scheme of naming PVR constant, >> QOM type and device description after the exact revision that is in fact >> encoded in the PVR used. >> That way, we can change the user-friendly alias -cpu POWER7+ to point to a >> different revision if we so desire, while not polluting the type namespace. >> >> This naming scheme is sensible and completely orthogonal to how PVRs may >> or may not get matched to CPU types. >> >> Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy <a...@ozlabs.ru> >> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> > > Thanks, applied to ppc-next and added a CC to qemu-stable so it gets into > 1.6.1. > > > Alex >