On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 01:44:44PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 14 August 2013 11:33, Russell King - ARM Linux > <li...@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 04:04:08PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > >> Hacked diff is below. Can I write that up as clean patch and submit it, > >> or do we need a test on real hardware ? > > > > Well, if we want to ensure that it is really correct, the sensible thing > > to do is to try it on real hardware, otherwise we're risking yet another > > change to this. > > > > Earlier in this thread, some people said that they have the hardware, so > > it shouldn't be that difficult to get it tested on real stuff. > > Yes, I definitely think we should test on the hardware before we > land yet another change to this PCI code that hasn't really been > thoroughly tested on anything. I have the board/backplane on my > desk but it'll be later in the week before I can do the testing > (currently still messing with uboot config to get it to actually > boot a kernel).
Realview or Versatile? I still need to sort out Realview. The alternative is - I have both the Realview EB and Versatile PB926 here, but no backplane (it wasn't deemed to be necessary for me to have such a thing.) If someone wants to donate a backplane...
