On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 06:19:16PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 22.07.2013 21:25, schrieb Eduardo Habkost: > > The series conflict with the current X86CPU static properties series from > > Igor, > > so it may need to be rebased in case Igor's patches get included first. > > > > Eduardo Habkost (2): > > i386: pass X86CPU object to cpu_x86_find_by_name() > > i386: disable PMU passthrough mode by default > > > > include/hw/i386/pc.h | 4 ++++ > > target-i386/cpu-qom.h | 7 +++++++ > > target-i386/cpu.c | 16 +++++++++++++--- > > 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > Ping! Is the PMU discussion converging towards a solution for 1.6?
Considering that the "bug compatibility" decision may be taken later when we actually introduce properly configurable/stable PMU CPUID leaves, I will send a new version introducing a "pmu" property that will be documented as not migration-safe by now. > > IIUC this is independent of Paolo's PMU patch, right? Yes. -- Eduardo
