When combining multiple accesses into a single value, we need to do so in the device's desired endianness. The target endianness does not have any influence.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> --- memory.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/memory.c b/memory.c index 77a34dd..b9139c5 100644 --- a/memory.c +++ b/memory.c @@ -339,6 +339,15 @@ static void flatview_simplify(FlatView *view) } } +static bool memory_region_big_endian(MemoryRegion *mr) +{ +#ifdef TARGET_WORDS_BIGENDIAN + return mr->ops->endianness != DEVICE_LITTLE_ENDIAN; +#else + return mr->ops->endianness == DEVICE_BIG_ENDIAN; +#endif +} + static bool memory_region_wrong_endianness(MemoryRegion *mr) { #ifdef TARGET_WORDS_BIGENDIAN @@ -454,13 +463,15 @@ static void access_with_adjusted_size(hwaddr addr, /* FIXME: support unaligned access? */ access_size = MAX(MIN(size, access_size_max), access_size_min); access_mask = -1ULL >> (64 - access_size * 8); - for (i = 0; i < size; i += access_size) { -#ifdef TARGET_WORDS_BIGENDIAN - access(mr, addr + i, value, access_size, - (size - access_size - i) * 8, access_mask); -#else - access(mr, addr + i, value, access_size, i * 8, access_mask); -#endif + if (memory_region_big_endian(mr)) { + for (i = 0; i < size; i += access_size) { + access(mr, addr + i, value, access_size, + (size - access_size - i) * 8, access_mask); + } + } else { + for (i = 0; i < size; i += access_size) { + access(mr, addr + i, value, access_size, i * 8, access_mask); + } } } -- 1.8.1.4