Il 18/07/2013 16:32, Peter Lieven ha scritto: >>> >> (Mis)alignment and granularity can be handled later. We can ignore them >> for now. Later, if we decide the best way to support them is a flag, >> we'll add it. Let's not put the cart before the horse. >> >> BTW, I expect alignment!=0 to be really, really rare. > To explain my concerns: > > I know that my target has internal page size of 15MB. I will check what > happens > if I deallocate this 15MB in chunks of lets say 1MB. If the page gets > unprovisioned > after the last chunk is unmapped it would be fine :-)
You're talking of granularity here, not (mis)alignment. Paolo
