For architectures with no linux-user target, don't claim no NPTL
support. This has no behavioural change, but it means that we
won't accidentally add a new linux-user target without threading
support in future (because attempting to do so would be a compile
failure rather than a silent lack of support).
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net>
---
configure | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure b/configure
index ae9519c..c159f34 100755
--- a/configure
+++ b/configure
@@ -4199,7 +4199,6 @@ case "$target_name" in
cris)
;;
lm32)
- target_nptl="no"
;;
m68k)
bflt="yes"
@@ -4228,7 +4227,6 @@ case "$target_name" in
target_nptl="no"
;;
moxie)
- target_nptl="no"
;;
or32)
TARGET_ARCH=openrisc
@@ -4282,7 +4280,6 @@ case "$target_name" in
;;
xtensa|xtensaeb)
TARGET_ARCH=xtensa
- target_nptl="no"
;;
*)
error_exit "Unsupported target CPU"
--
1.7.9.5
