On 8 July 2013 16:20, Anthony Liguori <anth...@codemonkey.ws> wrote: > Right, it goes: > > 1) Acked-by: > > I haven't reviewed the code in detail but the general idea seems sane. > > 2) Reviewed-by: > > The general idea seems sane, and I have done a thorough review of the > patch in question. > > 3) Signed-off-by: > > All of the above, plus I have ensured that the code is of good quality, > does not break things, and the other things expected of a maintainer. > This is considered to be a legally binding statement too based on the > DCO so be aware of that and ensure you have the right approval to make > such a statement.
I agree with this and it matches my idea of what the semantics are. -- PMM
