On 7 July 2013 23:05, Alex Bligh <a...@alex.org.uk> wrote:
>
>
> --On 7 July 2013 22:25:02 +0200 Stefan Weil <s...@weilnetz.de> wrote:
>
>> --- a/ui/vnc-enc-zywrle.h
>> +++ b/ui/vnc-enc-zywrle.h
>> @@ -305,9 +305,9 @@ static inline void harr(int8_t *px0, int8_t *px1)
>> |L1H0H1H0|L1H0H1H0|L1H0H1H0|L1H0H1H0| : level 1
>>
>> In this method, H/L and X0/X1 is always same position.
>> - This lead us to more speed and less memory.
>> - Of cause, the result of both method is quite same
>> - because it's only difference that coefficient position.
>> + This leads us to more speed and less memory.
>> + Of course, the result of both methods is quite same
>> + because its only difference is that coefficient position.
>> */
>> static inline void wavelet_level(int *data, int size, int l, int
>> skip_pixel) {
>
>
> If we're doing spelling/grammar fixes, that should be "is quite the same"
> and "that of coefficient position".
"is quite the same" isn't idiomatic English either. I can't
tell if the author meant "is quite similar" or "is exactly
the same", so we probably shouldn't change the text unless
we can work out which one is right...
-- PMM
