Il 02/07/2013 13:52, Jan Kiszka ha scritto:
>>> But then atomic_dec_and_test or so. Letting the inc/dec return some
>>> >> value leaves room for interpretations (value of before or after the
>>> >> modification?).
>> >
>> > In qemu, I made all atomic_* functions return the old value. This is
>> > consistent with atomic_cmpxchg and atomic_xchg (where returning the new
>> > value makes no sense).
> Please avoid this ambiguity by naming the functions properly. That xchg
> returns old values is known, that dec and inc do, is surely not.
IMO the ambiguity is resolved simply by looking at the docs or existing
code, but I can rename them to atomic_fetch_{add,sub,and,or,inc,dec} and
add void versions without "fetch".
Paolo
