Il 01/07/2013 13:05, Peter Maydell ha scritto: >> > This patch does not make things worse than before. If anything, it's >> > better because *more* targets have non-TLS semantics: namely non-KVM >> > targets on Linux become non-TLS. > That is making things worse! Non-TLS is the untested minority > case, we want to be taking things out of it, not pushing > configs that were previously TLS into it.
I think we should strive for one of these two: (1) all targets are TLS; (2) all targets are non-TLS if this is possible. Either maximizes the homogeneity across platforms. Paolo
