01.07.2013 14:08, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 30/06/2013 17:23, Michael Tokarev ha scritto: >>> Perhaps we can instead use something like >>>> >>>> common.o: $(patsubst %,../%, $(common-obj-y)) >>>> $(LD) -r -o $@ $^ >>>> >>>> and then link common.o into the QEMU target. Libtool can also be used >>>> to abstract "ld -r". Making libtool mandatory wouldn't be a problem IMO >>>> (we'd need it anyway for modules) as long as you do not need libtool to >>>> start QEMU or gdb from the build directory. >> I think this will mean that whole common.o will have to be linked >> into each executable which uses it, even if some executables are >> only using just one function from whole lot of .o files. > > This would be a different common.o for each directory.
Like util/common.o which requires -lrt and -lutil even if a given app does not use openpty() or timer_create() ? Thanks, /mjt
