On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 17:34:44 -0300
Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 05:30:50PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 03:18:41PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > [...]
> > > @@ -1632,6 +1677,7 @@ static void cpu_x86_parse_featurestr(X86CPU *cpu,
> > > char *features, Error **errp)
> > > } else if (!strcmp(featurestr, "hv-spinlocks")) {
> > > char *err;
> > > const int min = 0xFFF;
> > > + char num[32];
> > > numvalue = strtoul(val, &err, 0);
> > > if (!*val || *err) {
> > > error_setg(errp, "bad numerical value %s", val);
> > > @@ -1643,7 +1689,8 @@ static void cpu_x86_parse_featurestr(X86CPU *cpu,
> > > char *features, Error **errp)
> > > min);
> > > numvalue = min;
> > > }
> > > - env->hyperv_spinlock_attempts = numvalue;
> > > + snprintf(num, sizeof(num), "%" PRId32, numvalue);
> > > + object_property_parse(OBJECT(cpu), num, featurestr,
> > > errp);
> >
> > Why not use object_property_set_int()?
>
> Oh, I believe I have asked that before and you have already explained
> it: you are using strings to allow the existing object_property_parse()
> calls to be easily converted to qdev_prop_register_global() calls later.
> Correct?
>
Yep, this will be used later to consolidate code.
