On 06/25/2013 07:51 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
mrhi...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
From: "Michael R. Hines" <mrhi...@us.ibm.com>
These are the prototypes and implementation of new hooks that
RDMA takes advantage of to perform dynamic page registration.
An optional hook is also introduced for a custom function
to be able to override the default save_page function.
Also included are the prototypes and accessor methods used by
arch_init.c which invoke funtions inside savevm.c to call out
to the hooks that may or may not have been overridden
inside of QEMUFileOps.
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Chegu Vinod <chegu_vi...@hp.com>
Tested-by: Chegu Vinod <chegu_vi...@hp.com>
Tested-by: Michael R. Hines <mrhi...@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael R. Hines <mrhi...@us.ibm.com>
Hi
+void ram_control_before_iterate(QEMUFile *f, uint64_t flags)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ if (f->ops->before_ram_iterate) {
+ ret = f->ops->before_ram_iterate(f, f->opaque, flags);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ qemu_file_set_error(f, ret);
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+void ram_control_after_iterate(QEMUFile *f, uint64_t flags)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ if (f->ops->after_ram_iterate) {
+ ret = f->ops->after_ram_iterate(f, f->opaque, flags);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ qemu_file_set_error(f, ret);
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+void ram_control_load_hook(QEMUFile *f, uint64_t flags)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ if (f->ops->hook_ram_load) {
+ ret = f->ops->hook_ram_load(f, f->opaque, flags);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ qemu_file_set_error(f, ret);
+ }
+ } else {
+ qemu_file_set_error(f, ret);
+ }
+}
+
+size_t ram_control_save_page(QEMUFile *f, ram_addr_t block_offset,
+ ram_addr_t offset, size_t size, int *bytes_sent)
+{
+ if (f->ops->save_page) {
+ int ret = f->ops->save_page(f, f->opaque, block_offset,
+ offset, size, bytes_sent);
+
+ if (ret != RAM_SAVE_CONTROL_DELAYED) {
+ if (*bytes_sent > 0) {
+ qemu_update_position(f, *bytes_sent);
+ } else if (ret < 0) {
+ qemu_file_set_error(f, ret);
+ }
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return RAM_SAVE_CONTROL_NOT_SUPP;
+}
+
static void qemu_fill_buffer(QEMUFile *f)
{
int len;
I wou0ld clame that the calls to this functions belong to this patch.
Not that it makes a lot of difference though.
Later, Juan.
I'll avoid rebasing if there's no strong objection - as this ordering
was suggested by Paolo.
- Michael
