On 22 June 2013 17:10, Zhihui Zhang <zzhs...@gmail.com> wrote: > This way, jmp_next[0] means "taken" for both conditional jumps AND > unconditional jumps. > Currently, it has opposite meanings for the two cases.
This commit message is missing a rationale: do you want to do this because: * it fixes a bug? (if so, what bug) * it is more efficient? (if so, some description of why) * you just think it would be neater this way around? How about the TB exit via gen_jz_ecx_string ? thanks -- PMM
