On 16 June 2013 21:26, Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 05:57:44PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Revert commit d6b9e0d60cc511eca210834428bb74508cff3d33 (cpu: Add
>> qemu_for_each_cpu()) and its usage in favor of open-coding CPU loops,
>> now that they are based on CPUState.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de>
>
> Open-coding is kind of nasty though.
>
> How about
> #define qemu_for_each_cpu(cpu) \
>     for (cpu = first_cpu; cpu != NULL; cpu = cpu->next_cpu)

Personally for an iteration that simple I would prefer
the opencoded version -- it's more immediately
obvious what it's doing and that it's not doing anything
weird.

Precedent isn't everything, but a quick grep for 'foreach'
and 'for_each' suggests that we generally use the callback-fn
style rather than iterator macros.

thanks
-- PMM

Reply via email to