Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de> writes: > On 14.06.2013, at 13:40, Markus Armbruster wrote: > >> This is on top of "[PATCH v3 00/16] -boot and -no-fd-bootchk fixes", >> so it's protected by the tests there. >> >> The first five patches are admittedly related to the stated purpose of >> this series pretty much only by "I can't stand perpetuating this >> stupid crap". Max Filippov and Peter Maydell already cleaned up >> Xtensa and ARM the same way. > > PPC patches are: > > Acked-by: Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de> > > As for the functional change of defaulting boot_order to NULL on most > boards, I'm reasonably indifferent. I suppose the purpose of the > rename was to detect all cases where it gets used, so it _should_ be > safe to default to NULL.
Exactly! The rename forces me to examine every machine that actually uses the default boot order. I null the default only for machines that don't. Apart from that, the rename also makes names more consistent :)
