On 7 June 2013 03:54, Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com> wrote: > Ping! > > We are stuck in limbo here and I would like to get either V1 or V2 > (this patch) of this through. > > Paolo, > > If you are not happy with this patch, does V1 address your concerns > (which was its original intention).
Given what David has said I think this v2 is correct and v1 is wrong. If a distro-supplied libfdt has to provide a libfdt_env.h then we are correct to check for it before use (with fallback to the submodule). If Fedora has a requirement to use its packaged libfdt then they can achieve that by fixing their libfdt package. Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> thanks -- PMM
