email accidentally sent with cc supression, so cc qemu-trivial as intended.
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:38 PM, <peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com> wrote: > From: Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com> > > Use qemu_set_irq rather than if-elsing qemu_irq_(lower|raise). No > functional change, just reduces verbosity. > > Cc: qemu-triv...@nongnu.org > > Signed-off-by: Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com> > --- > > hw/intc/xilinx_intc.c | 6 +----- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/intc/xilinx_intc.c b/hw/intc/xilinx_intc.c > index b106e72..5df7008 100644 > --- a/hw/intc/xilinx_intc.c > +++ b/hw/intc/xilinx_intc.c > @@ -66,11 +66,7 @@ static void update_irq(struct xlx_pic *p) > i = ~0; > > p->regs[R_IVR] = i; > - if ((p->regs[R_MER] & 1) && p->regs[R_IPR]) { > - qemu_irq_raise(p->parent_irq); > - } else { > - qemu_irq_lower(p->parent_irq); > - } > + qemu_set_irq(p->parent_irq, (p->regs[R_MER] & 1) && p->regs[R_IPR]); > } > > static uint64_t > -- > 1.8.3.rc1.44.gb387c77.dirty >