On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Anthony Liguori <anth...@codemonkey.ws> wrote: > In terms of creating a FAT module, the most likely source would seem to > be the kernel code and since that's GPL, I don't think it's terribly > avoidable to end up with a GPL'd uefi implementation.
Why would OpenBSD not be a potential source? http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/msdosfs/ We have a half-done ext2 fs from GSoC2011 that started with OpenBSD. https://github.com/the-ridikulus-rat/Tianocore_Ext2Pkg > If that's inevitable, then we're wasting effort by rewriting stuff under > a BSD license. > > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori
