Il 26/05/2013 19:08, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
> Have you actually tried that out with a patch such as the following?
>
> diff --git a/hw/ide/core.c b/hw/ide/core.c
> index c7a8041..bf1ff18 100644
> --- a/hw/ide/core.c
> +++ b/hw/ide/core.c
> @@ -795,6 +795,8 @@ static void ide_flush_cb(void *opaque, int ret)
> {
> IDEState *s = opaque;
>
> + s->status &= ~BUSY_STAT;
> +
> if (ret < 0) {
> /* XXX: What sector number to set here? */
> if (ide_handle_rw_error(s, -ret, BM_STATUS_RETRY_FLUSH)) {
> @@ -814,6 +816,7 @@ void ide_flush_cache(IDEState *s)
> return;
> }
>
> + s->status |= BUSY_STAT;
> bdrv_acct_start(s->bs, &s->acct, 0, BDRV_ACCT_FLUSH);
> bdrv_aio_flush(s->bs, ide_flush_cb, s);
> }
Yes, this patch is correct. Can you resend with S-o-b?
Paolo
